Evaluation Criteria Criteria Weight What We’re Looking For Problem Selection 25% Did you identify something real? Is this a problem worth solving? Does it show understanding of the product and its users? Execution 35% Does it work? Is it usable? Did you actually build what you said you would? Impact Potential 25% If this were polished and deployed, would it matter? Would people use it? Would it save time, money, or frustration? Clarity of Thought 15% Can you explain why this matters? Is your demo coherent? Do you understand the problem deeply?
Scores Criteria Weight Kapil (Raw) Kapil (Wtd) Anurag (Raw) Anurag (Wtd) Manasvi (Raw) Manasvi (Wtd) Harsh (Raw) Harsh (Wtd) Problem Selection 25% 10 2.50 9 2.25 9 2.25 9 2.25 Execution 35% 5 1.75 6 2.10 5 1.75 6 2.10 Impact Potential 25% 10 2.50 10 2.50 8 2.00 10 2.50 Clarity of Thought 15% 9 1.35 10 1.50 10 1.50 9 1.35 Total 8.10 8.35 7.50 8.20
🥇 1st Place — Anurag Score: 8.35
Evaluation Criteria Criteria Weight What We’re Looking For Working CRUD 25% Can you create, read, update, and list prompts end-to-end? Variable Rendering 20% Does the template engine correctly fill in variables? Live preview works? LLM Test Feature 20% Can you render a prompt and get an LLM response from the UI? Version History 15% Are versions tracked? Can you view and rollback? UI/UX 10% Is the interface clean and usable? Doesn’t need to be pretty — needs to be functional. Code Quality 10% Clean structure, error handling, separation of concerns
Scores Code Quality was not evaluated for either intern. Weighted scores below are normalized across the remaining 5 criteria (90% total weight redistributed proportionally).
Criteria Weight Anusha (Raw) Anusha (Wtd) Kashvi (Raw) Kashvi (Wtd) Working CRUD 27.78% 9 2.50 8 2.22 Variable Rendering 22.22% 10 2.22 10 2.22 LLM Test Feature 22.22% 3 0.67 0 0.00 Version History 16.67% 8 1.33 0 0.00 UI/UX 11.11% 8 0.89 6 0.67 Code Quality — N/A — N/A — Total 7.61 5.11
🥇 1st Place — Anusha Score: 7.61
